All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Model Code of Conduct

Also written Model Code of Conduct for Category III AIF Distributors

A 21-point conduct code every Category III AIF distributor must follow, covering disclosure, suitability, confidentiality and fair dealing — read alongside SEBI's own AIF Code of Conduct.

In plain language

A distributor sells a Category III AIF to investors who are sophisticated, but still take real risk. What stops the distributor from cutting corners on disclosure? What stops it from chasing commission over suitability?

Every Distributor must write its own Internal Code of Conduct. It must share this with employees and with any outside service providers it uses. The workbook goes further still. It sets out a Model Code of Conduct for Category III AIF Distributors — a named list of 21 conduct points. Read it alongside the separate Code of Conduct already written into the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations. It does not replace that Code.

How it works

The Model Code's 21 points cover several themes:

  • Regulatory compliance: adhering to SEBI's AIF Regulations and related circulars on distribution, marketing, benchmarking and investor reporting.
  • Disclosure: being fully conversant with the PPM, disclosing material information including Hurdle Rate, Management Fees, Additional Returns, catch-up provisions and distribution commissions received.
  • Suitability and honesty: considering investor interest and risk profiling, never letting commission drive a recommendation, never assuring returns, and never misrepresenting or exaggerating.
  • Integrity: maintaining high standards of promptitude and fairness, and desisting from manipulative, fraudulent or deceptive practices.
  • Confidentiality and compliance support: maintaining confidentiality of investor data, assisting with KYC, and providing documents to tax and enforcement authorities as required under law.
  • Fair dealing with the market: abstaining from negative statements about competing Category III AIFs, and comparing funds only on a like-for-like basis.
  • Disclosure on social media: prominently disclosing registered names and registration numbers on social media handles and at the start of relevant content.

The Code is enforced through Chapter 10's three sub-sections on fraudulent and unfair trade practices, conflicts of interest, and marketing activities detrimental to investors — each of which restates and applies specific points from the 21-point list.

A worked example

Vasant Distributors, empanelled with a Category III AIF, is preparing to pitch the fund to a retired schoolteacher with a moderate risk appetite.

Applying the Model Code, Vasant Distributors: discloses the fund's 2% management fee and 20% incentive fee upfront; explains the fund's lock-in and Exit Load; declines to describe the fund's target returns as "assured"; and discloses that it will earn a 1% distribution commission on the investment.

When a colleague at a rival distribution firm suggests badmouthing a competing Category III AIF to win the client over, Vasant Distributors refuses — point xix of the Model Code specifically bars making negative statements about funds it does not represent, requiring any comparison to be between similar, comparable funds.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 10, section 10.4 (Code of Conduct), sets out the full 21-point Model Code of Conduct for Category III AIF Distributors, footnoted as read alongside SEBI's own AIF Regulations Code of Conduct. The chapter's three sub-sections — fraudulent and unfair trade practices, conflicts of interest, and detrimental marketing — apply specific points from the list. Expect a question asking which of a set of practices the Model Code prohibits, drawn directly from the 21 numbered points.

Common exam traps

  • This is a distributor-specific code for Category III AIFs — it is a different document from SEBI's general Code of Conduct for stock brokers, even though both share the phrase "code of conduct".
  • The Model Code is read alongside the AIF Regulations' own Code of Conduct, not as a replacement for it — the footnote is explicit about this.
  • Commission can never be the basis for a recommendation — point vii states this directly, and it recurs as the theme tying suitability, soft dollar arrangements and pass-backs together.
  • The social media disclosure point (xxi) is dated 2026 in the workbook's footnote — a recent addition, worth remembering as current rather than assuming it is longstanding.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Under the Model Code of Conduct, in relation to distribution commissions a distributor must:

    1. a)keep them confidential, as they are a matter between the distributor and the fund
    2. b)disclose the details of commissions receivable on subscription to various classes of units, and ensure commissions never form the basis for recommending a fund
    3. c)disclose them only where an investor specifically asks
    4. d)rebate a portion to the investor to align interests
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) disclose the details of commissions receivable on subscription to various classes of units, and ensure commissions never form the basis for recommending a fund

    Two clauses of the Code operate together. The distributor must disclose all material information including the details of distribution commissions to be received, on subscription to various classes of units offered by the Category III AIF, and must ensure that commissions or incentives on sale of Category III AIF units shall never form as the basis for recommending a fund or scheme. Disclosure alone would not be enough. Option (d) describes a pass-back, which is expressly prohibited.

  2. 2.A Category III AIF distributor runs a social media channel on which it uploads videos about the securities market. Under the Model Code of Conduct, what must it disclose, and where?

    1. a)Its registered name and registration number, only in the PPM of each scheme it distributes
    2. b)Its registration number at the end of each video, only when a specific scheme is named
    3. c)Its registered name(s) and registration number(s), prominently on the home page of its social media handles and at the beginning of each video or content relating to the securities market
    4. d)Nothing, unless it holds registrations with more than one regulator
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) Its registered name(s) and registration number(s), prominently on the home page of its social media handles and at the beginning of each video or content relating to the securities market

    Item (xxi) of the Model Code of Conduct says ‘AIFs and their distributors (with single and multiple registration) shall prominently disclose their registered name(s) and registration number(s) on the home page of their social media handles as well as at the beginning of each of the videos/content (which relate to the securities market) uploaded by them’.

    • The requirement is about social media, not the PPM.
    • The disclosure goes at the beginning of each video, and for all securities-market content — not at the end, and not only when a scheme is named.
    • It applies to entities with single and multiple registration alike.
  3. 3.A pass-back offered by a distributor to an investor is:

    1. a)a permitted marketing incentive, provided it is disclosed to the fund
    2. b)a part of the commission earned from the AIF given back to the investor, prohibited because it discourages decisions based on the merit of the fund
    3. c)a rebate on the management fee agreed with the investment manager
    4. d)a payment by the investor to the distributor for advisory services
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) a part of the commission earned from the AIF given back to the investor, prohibited because it discourages decisions based on the merit of the fund

    Pass-backs are an indirect incentive provided to potential investors, wherein the distributor gives back a part of the commission earned from the AIF, to the investor. This represents an inherent conflict wherein potential investors are discouraged to take investment decisions based on the merit of the fund and investment strategy implemented by the investment manager. The Model Code of Conduct lists it alongside rebate, gifts or other concessions among the unethical means through which investors must not be attracted.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it