All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Transaction Expenses

Costs of buying, selling or disposing of a Category III AIF's investments — brokerage, depository and custodian transaction charges, STT and exchange charges — borne by the fund and allocated pro-rata across classes.

In plain language

Every trade a fund makes costs something beyond the price of the security: a broker's fee, a depository charge, securities transaction tax. For a Category III AIF, which may trade actively and use derivatives, these add up.

The workbook is clear about who pays. The Category III AIF shall bear and pay all transaction expenses in relation to buying, selling or disposal of investments. They are borne by the fund, not the manager, and allocated on a pro-rata basis across all classes of units, based on capital contributions or NAV.

They sit alongside, and separate from, the fund's other cost heads: set-up costs, operating expenses, trusteeship fees, and the management and incentive fees paid to the manager.

How it works

The five items the workbook lists

  1. Brokerage charges
  2. Depository charges
  3. Custodian transaction charges
  4. Securities transaction taxes
  5. Costs and charges imposed by stock exchanges

What the fund does NOT pay. Costs of the investment management function belong to the manager and cannot be charged to the fund — including lease or rent, office maintenance, travel, outsourced support, investment due diligence and transaction documentation costs pertaining to deal execution (Chapter 3). So the brokerage on a trade is a fund cost, while the manager's own deal paperwork is not.

Management fee is on top. In the Chapter 6 comparison with mutual funds, a Category III AIF's management fee is charged in addition to all operating expenses and transaction costs; operating expenses are usually capped by the fund at up to 0.5% of AUM. In a mutual fund, operating expenses and transaction costs sit inside the BER limit unless SEBI specifies otherwise. In a PMS, operating expenses other than brokerage may not exceed 0.5% a year and brokerage is charged at actuals.

Tax treatment depends on how income is classified (Chapter 9). If gains are business income, STT paid is deductible as a business expense. If gains are capital gains, STT paid on purchase or sale is not added to cost of acquisition, while expenditure in connection with the transfer, such as brokerage, is deductible from the sale consideration.

A worked example

Illustrative figures. Vindhya Equity Opportunities Fund buys listed shares worth Rs 20 crore on delivery.

STT on delivery purchase at 0.1% (Chapter 9 rate) = 0.1% × Rs 20 crore = Rs 2,00,000
Brokerage (illustrative 0.05%)                      = 0.05% × Rs 20 crore = Rs 1,00,000
Depository, custodian and exchange charges (illustrative) = Rs 20,000
Total transaction expenses                                 = Rs 3,20,000

The fund has three classes, with capital contributions of Rs 60 crore, Rs 30 crore and Rs 10 crore. Allocating pro-rata on contributions:

ClassShareAllocation
A60%Rs 1,92,000
B30%Rs 96,000
C10%Rs 32,000
Total100%Rs 3,20,000

The same week, the manager's lawyers bill Rs 4 lakh for documenting a PIPE deal. That is a transaction documentation cost of deal execution — the manager pays it; it does not reach the fund's books.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 6 (Fees Structure, Fund Performance and Benchmarking) lists transaction expenses among the costs the fund bears in 6.1.1, and a Chapter 6 sample question asks exactly who bears them and how they are allocated: borne by the fund, allocated pro-rata based on capital contributions or NAV. Chapter 3 draws the line with costs the manager must bear, and Chapter 9 covers STT rates and whether STT and brokerage are deductible.

Common exam traps

  • Borne by the fund, not the manager — and allocated pro-rata, not equally per investor. That is the sample question's distractor.
  • Allocation base: capital contributions or NAV.
  • Transaction documentation costs of deal execution are the manager's, not transaction expenses of the fund.
  • Management fee is charged in addition to transaction costs in a Category III AIF, unlike a mutual fund where they sit within the BER limit.
  • For capital gains, STT is not added to cost of acquisition, but brokerage on the transfer is deductible from the sale consideration.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Transaction expenses in a Category III AIF are:

    1. a)borne by the Manager and allocated equally across all investors
    2. b)borne by the Fund and allocated pro-rata based on capital contributions or NAV
    3. c)shared equally between the Manager and the Sponsor
    4. d)deducted only from profits realised at exit
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) borne by the Fund and allocated pro-rata based on capital contributions or NAV

    This is the workbook's own sample question. A Category III AIF shall bear and pay all transaction expenses in relation to buying, selling or disposal of investments, and they are borne by the Fund and allocated on a pro-rata basis, across all classes of units, based on capital contributions or NAV. They comprise brokerage charges, depository charges, custodian transaction charges, securities transaction taxes, and costs and charges imposed by stock exchanges.

  2. 2.Which term describes the highest Net Asset Value, net of all expenses and management fees, achieved by a Category III AIF at the end of the year?

    1. a)High-Water Mark
    2. b)Hurdle Rate
    3. c)Net Asset Value (Pre-tax)
    4. d)Gross NAV
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) High-Water Mark

    This is the workbook's own sample question. The High-Water Mark is the highest Net Asset Value, net of operating expenses, transaction expenses and management fees, achieved by the Category III AIF at the end of the year, and where NAV has only fallen since inception it is taken as the initial subscription price of units. Gross NAV cannot be right because the definition is expressly net of expenses and fees, and the hurdle rate is a rate of return, not a NAV.

  3. 3.Which statement about the Set-up Costs (Organisational Expenses) of a Category III AIF is correct?

    1. a)They are charged every year as a percentage of Gross NAV, like Management Fees
    2. b)They are borne by the Investment Manager out of its Management Fees and are never charged to unit holders
    3. c)They are a one-time charge of up to 1.5 or 2 per cent of total capital commitments, which can be amortised over the first 36 months or the fund's entire life from First Closing
    4. d)They are allocated across investors in proportion to NAV on each Valuation Day, like transaction expenses
    Show the answer

    Answer: (c) They are a one-time charge of up to 1.5 or 2 per cent of total capital commitments, which can be amortised over the first 36 months or the fund's entire life from First Closing

    The workbook says ‘The Manager will charge one-time Set-up Costs from the unit-holders as a percentage of their total capital commitments, which can go up to 1.5 percent or 2 percent of total capital commitments raised by the fund’, and that they ‘can be amortized over the first 36 months, or the entire life of the Category III AIF, commencing from the date of First Closing’. They cover offering costs, drafting the PPM, registration and compliance costs and intermediaries' fees, plus GST.

    • An annual charge on Gross NAV describes Management Fees, not set-up costs.
    • Set-up costs are charged to the unit-holders, not absorbed by the Manager.
    • Allocation is ‘on a pro-rata basis to all investors, based on their value of total capital commitments’ — it is transaction expenses that are allocated on capital contributions or NAV.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it