All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Amortized Cost

Also written Amortised cost

A debt security's purchase cost adjusted for the purchase discount or premium over its maturity — how a Category III AIF values unlisted securities with no ascertainable market, plus accrued interest.

In plain language

Some securities simply have no market price. An unlisted bond held by a Category III AIF may not trade for months. The fund still has to strike a NAV on every Valuation Day, so it needs a rule.

For unlisted securities for which there is no ascertainable market, the rule is amortized cost plus interest accrued from the date of purchase.

Amortized cost starts from what the fund paid and moves it gradually toward the bond's face value. If the bond was bought at a discount to face value, the carrying value rises over the remaining life; if at a premium, it falls. By maturity the two meet. The workbook describes it as the purchase cost, after adjusting the discount or premium on purchase throughout the maturity period of the bond.

How it works

Where it sits among valuation rules (as on the Valuation Day):

SecurityBasis
Listed securitiesClosing price
Unlisted equityCost, then fair market value by independent valuer
Unlisted non-equity with an ascertainable marketClosing price on that market
Unlisted, no ascertainable marketAmortized cost + interest accrued since purchase

Versus mark-to-market. For money market instruments and long-term debt the workbook prefers mark-to-market, using prices from FBIL, CCIL, FIMMDA and similar agencies, exchange closing prices and VWAY. It says that, instead of the amortized cost approach, mark-to-market is more reliable and transparent, although it may reduce managers' discretion, and that using mark-to-market reduces the potential default risk arising from a downgrade in credit rating.

The method is not prescribed. The workbook does not say whether the discount or premium is spread evenly or by an effective-interest calculation. The example below spreads it evenly only to show the idea.

The formula

Value on Valuation Day = Amortized cost + Interest accrued since purchase

Amortized cost = Purchase cost ± portion of discount/premium amortized to date

A worked example

Illustrative figures, straight-line amortization. On 1 April, a Category III AIF buys 10,000 unlisted 8% bonds, face value Rs 1,000, at Rs 960 each, with 4 years to maturity. There is no ascertainable market.

Discount on purchase        = Rs 1,000 − Rs 960 = Rs 40 per bond
Amortized per year          = Rs 40 ÷ 4         = Rs 10
Amortized per half-year     = Rs 5

Valuation Day, 30 September (six months):

Amortized cost              = Rs 960 + Rs 5            = Rs   965
Interest accrued (6 months) = 8% × Rs 1,000 × 6/12     = Rs    40
Value per bond                                         = Rs 1,005
Holding value               = 10,000 × Rs 1,005        = Rs 1,00,50,000

A year later the amortized cost would be Rs 975, and at maturity Rs 1,000. None of these figures moves because interest rates or the issuer's credit changed — which is exactly the workbook's reason for preferring mark-to-market wherever a market exists.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 8 (Valuation) introduces amortized cost in section 8.1's valuation rules, applies it to the unlisted corporate bonds of RCE Ltd in the Fund INC NAV examples, and contrasts it with mark-to-market in section 8.2.3. Expect questions on which holdings are valued at amortized cost, whether accrued interest is added, and why the workbook prefers mark-to-market for traded debt.

Common exam traps

  • Amortized cost is for unlisted securities with no ascertainable market. An unlisted security that does have a market is valued at its closing price.
  • Unlisted equity is not at amortized cost — it is valued at cost initially and then at fair market value by the independent valuer.
  • Add interest accrued from the date of purchase. The workbook's Fund INC example assumes none accrued, so it values the bond at amortized cost alone.
  • Mark-to-market is described as more reliable and transparent than amortized cost.
  • A workbook arithmetic slip. Fund INC's RCE Ltd holding shows 1,000 bonds of face value Rs 10,000 at a rate of 105 valued at Rs 10,50,00,000. At those inputs the face value is Rs 1 crore and 105% of it is Rs 1.05 crore, not Rs 10.50 crore. The NAV totals use Rs 10.50 crore; do not reproduce the line as a method.

Check yourself

  1. 1.A Category III AIF holds unlisted debentures for which there is no ascertainable market. How are they valued on a Valuation Day?

    1. a)At amortised cost, plus any interest accrued from the date of purchase
    2. b)At the closing price of the most comparable listed debenture
    3. c)Initially at cost and thereafter at Fair Market Value determined by an independent valuer
    4. d)At face value until maturity
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) At amortised cost, plus any interest accrued from the date of purchase

    The workbook's rule: ‘For unlisted securities for which there is no ascertainable market, valuation will be done at amortized cost of such security, plus interest (if any) accrued from the date of such purchase’. In the Fund INC example, the unlisted RCE Ltd. bonds are carried at amortised cost.

    • Where an unlisted non-equity security does have an ascertainable market, the rule is ‘the closing price dealt on the market on which the securities are traded’ — on that market, not on a comparable security.
    • Initially at cost, then Fair Market Value by the independent valuer is the rule for unlisted equity.
    • Face value appears nowhere in the valuation rules.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it