NISM Professor

Mark to Market

Also written MTM · Mark to Market (MTM) · Mark to market (MTM) · Marking to market · MTM settlement · Daily settlement

The daily settlement of a futures position at that day's closing price, so gains and losses are paid in cash every evening instead of accumulating until expiry.

In plain language

A futures contract may run for months. The profit and loss on it does not wait that long.

At the end of every trading day the exchange revalues every open position at the day's settlement price, collects the loss in cash from whoever lost and pays it in cash to whoever gained, and then treats that closing price as the new cost of the position for the next day.

The point is credit, not accounting. If a losing position were allowed to run for three months, the loss would grow to a size the loser might not be able to pay. Settling every evening keeps the exposure to one day's price move.

How it works

Three consequences follow from "the position restarts each day at the settlement price".

  1. Your cumulative MTM equals your total move. The daily amounts telescope: however many days you hold, the sum of the daily settlements is the entry price minus the exit price, times the lot.
  2. Initial margin is not a deposit against final loss. It is a buffer against one day's move, replenished daily. When MTM losses eat into it and the balance falls below requirement, you get a margin call and must top up, or the position is squared off.
  3. Cash moves even when you are right in the end. A position that finishes profitable can demand large cash payments on the way — which is why a hedger needs liquidity, not just a correct view.

In interest rate futures the daily settlement price used for MTM is the daily settlement price (DSP) computed by the exchange, and both MTM and final settlement are on a T+1 basis.

The formula

Day 1 MTM = (Settlement price − Trade price) × Lot size × Contracts
Day n MTM = (Today's settlement − Yesterday's settlement) × Lot size × Contracts

Long positions gain when the settlement rises; short positions gain when it falls.

A worked example

On 14 May 2024 a trader buys one Nifty May futures at 22,250, lot size 25.

Contract value = 22,250 × 25 = Rs 5,56,250
Initial margin at 10%       = Rs   55,625

That evening Nifty May futures settle at 22,308.70:

MTM = (22,308.70 − 22,250) × 25 = 58.70 × 25 = Rs 1,468 credited

His position now starts tomorrow from 22,308.70, not 22,250. Carry the illustration two more days:

DaySettlementMoveMTM (× 25)Margin balance
Entry22,250.00Rs 55,625
Day 122,308.70+58.70+Rs 1,468Rs 57,093
Day 222,180.00−128.70−Rs 3,218Rs 53,875
Day 322,060.00−120.00−Rs 3,000Rs 50,875

Check the telescoping: 1,468 − 3,218 − 3,000 = −Rs 4,750, and directly, (22,060 − 22,250) × 25 = −190 × 25 = −Rs 4,750. Identical, as it must be.

But look at the margin. At the day-3 settlement the contract is worth 22,060 × 25 = Rs 5,51,500, so 10% initial margin is Rs 55,150 against a balance of Rs 50,875. The trader gets a margin call for Rs 4,275 and must fund it before the next session — on a position that has moved less than 1% against him.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 15 (Introduction to Forwards and Futures) introduces MTM immediately after initial margin, with exactly the 14 May 2024 Nifty numbers used above. Chapter 20 repeats it for exchange traded interest rate futures, where MTM and final settlement are on T+1 and the daily settlement price is defined separately. Expect a one- or two-day MTM computation, and a conceptual question on why only the option seller faces MTM margin while both parties to a futures contract do.

Common exam traps

  • MTM is settled in cash daily; it is not a book entry. Money actually leaves or enters the account each evening.
  • The reference price resets every day. Day 2's MTM is measured from Day 1's settlement, not from your original trade price. Computing every day from the entry price double-counts.
  • Initial margin and MTM margin are different things. Initial margin is posted to open the position; MTM margin is the daily profit-and-loss transfer.
  • Forwards generally have no MTM. The workbook is explicit — in a forward, nothing settles until maturity, which is exactly where the counterparty risk builds up.
  • In options only the writer is marked to market, because only the writer has an open obligation.
  • A hedge that is "working" can still generate large MTM outflows while the offsetting gain on the physical portfolio is unrealised. That mismatch is a liquidity problem, not a hedging failure.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-C

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it