NISM Professor

Compulsory delivery

Also written Compulsory delivery contract · Compulsory delivery logic

A delivery logic under which every position still open at expiry must give or take physical delivery — neither side can elect to settle in cash.

In plain language

Most people who trade commodity futures never intend to see the commodity. On a compulsory delivery contract, intention is irrelevant.

If you are short at expiry, you deliver quality-certified goods of the contracted quantity. If you are long, you pay and you take them. There is no cash-settlement escape hatch, no matter how unwelcome a kilogram of gold or ten tonnes of mustard seed may be.

That is what keeps the futures price honest. A contract that can always be closed in cash can drift from the physical market; a contract that ends in real grain in a real warehouse cannot drift far, because somebody will arbitrage the gap by actually buying the grain.

How it works

The workbook lists three delivery logics — compulsory delivery, both options and cash settlement — and the contract specification names which one applies. Gold is a compulsory delivery contract.

Under compulsory delivery, both buyer and seller with an open position during the tender or delivery period are obligated to take or give delivery. In many such contracts the tender marking period begins well ahead of maturity. Any open interest surviving the expiry date is settled through physical delivery, full stop.

Three consequences follow, and each is examinable:

  • Every compulsory delivery futures contract must have a staggered delivery period. Deliveries are spread rather than crammed into expiry day.
  • Once the tender period opens, the contract trades like a cash market, not a futures market. A fresh long bought on day one of the tender period carries a real risk of being matched against a seller who has tagged a delivery intention.
  • Failure to deliver is not free. The short who cannot produce the goods pays the delivery default penalty and compensates the buyer.

Open interest remaining on the settlement date is therefore read by the market as a direct forecast of how much commodity will actually move.

A worked example

Gold, one lot, held to expiry.

A speculator is short one gold futures contract — lot 1 kilogram — that he sold at Rs 49,600 per 10 grams. He forgets to square off. The Final Settlement Price is Rs 50,000 per 10 grams.

ObligationAmount
Value of the lot at FSPRs 50,00,000
Plus GST on the tax-paid invoice he must raiseas applicable
Tender period margin already lodged, at 20% of contract valueRs 10,00,000

He must now hand over one kilogram of quality-certified gold, evidenced by a warehouse receipt, into the clearing corporation's pay-in. He does not own a kilogram of gold.

His choices are two. Buy the metal in the physical market, deposit it, get it assayed, and deliver — which takes days he no longer has. Or default, and pay, on a non-agricultural commodity:

Penalty = 3% of settlement price + replacement cost
        = 3% x 50,00,000 + replacement cost
        = Rs 1,50,000 + replacement cost

of which Rs 87,500 (1.75%) goes to the Settlement Guarantee Fund, up to Rs 12,500 (0.25%) is retained by the clearing corporation, and Rs 50,000 (1%) plus the whole replacement cost goes to the buyer he let down.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 6 (Trading Mechanism), section 6.2.4 on delivery logic, and Chapter 7 (Clearing, Settlement and Risk Management), section 7.3.1. Expect "in compulsory delivery, both buyer and seller having an open position during the tender/delivery period are obligated to ____", and questions pairing compulsory delivery with the mandatory staggered delivery period.

Common exam traps

  • Compulsory delivery is set by the contract, not chosen by the trader. It is a specification, like lot size.
  • Both options is the logic where either side can refuse. Under compulsory delivery neither can.
  • All compulsory delivery contracts must have a staggered delivery period. Cash-settled contracts do not.
  • After the tender period opens, the contract behaves like a cash market. Taking a fresh position there is not the same trade it was a week earlier.
  • Gold is compulsory delivery; index futures are not. Bullion being expensive does not make it cash settled.
  • The exchange guarantees financial settlement, not gross delivery — a defaulted buyer gets compensation and the penalty share, not the commodity.

Check yourself

  1. 1.Under the staggered delivery mechanism, a buyer randomly assigned a delivery obligation by the exchange must take delivery:

    1. a)On the same day
    2. b)On the next day
    3. c)On the expiry date
    4. d)On T+2 day
    Show the answer

    Answer: (d) On T+2 day

    (This is a sample question from the NISM workbook.)

    "THE CORRESPONDING BUYER WILL BE RANDOMLY ALLOCATED by the trading system of the exchange, and THEY WILL HAVE TO TAKE THE DELIVERY ON THE T+2 DAY AT THE DESIGNATED DELIVERY CENTRE where the seller has delivered the commodity through TITLE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF PHYSICAL GOODS."

    The purpose of the whole mechanism: "This is to ENSURE CONFIRMATION OF DELIVERY IN THE NEAR MONTH CONTRACT AND TO KEEP THE PRICE VOLATILITY UNDER CHECK."

    Spreading deliveries over several days, rather than concentrating every obligation on expiry day, prevents a last-minute scramble in which anyone short of goods can be squeezed.

    What changed recently: ⚠️ "SEBI via circular dated MAY 24, 2024 HAS REDUCED THE STAGGERED DELIVERY PERIOD to THREE DAYS FROM THE EARLIER FIVE DAYS." And "ALL COMPULSORY DELIVERY COMMODITY FUTURE CONTRACTS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A STAGGERED DELIVERY PERIOD."

    The price used: "The settlement price for any delivery allocation during the staggered delivery period — i.e. UP TO ONE DAY PRIOR TO EXPIRY — WOULD BE THE LAST AVAILABLE SPOT PRICE DISPLAYED BY THE EXCHANGE." Note that it is a spot price, not the futures price, because at this stage the transaction really is a cash market transaction.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XVI

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it