All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Contribution Agreement

Also written Subscription Agreement · Investor Contribution Agreement · Subscription (Investor Contribution) Agreement · Contribution (Subscription) Agreement

The agreement between one investor, the trustee and the investment manager that sets the terms on which that investor participates in the AIF — the contract that turns a commitment into units.

In plain language

The PPM tells an investor what the fund intends to do. The Contribution Agreement is what the investor actually signs.

It is executed by and between each contributor, the trustee and the investment manager — three parties, not two — and it sets out the conditionalities for that investor to participate in the fund. It is amenable to amendment from time to time.

And it is not shared with the other contributors, because it carries representations and warranties specific to each one. Two investors in the same scheme sign two different documents.

How it works

The scope of the agreement follows from what an AIF investment is. Because most fund investments are blind pool investing — the investor commits to the pool, and the manager picks the deals afterwards — everything has to be settled before any deal exists. So the subscription agreement covers computation of beneficial interest, drawdowns, the distribution waterfall, the commercial aspects of fees and expenses, the fund governance structure and the powers of the investment committee.

Two mechanical points sit here as well. Units representing unit capital have to be issued in dematerialised mode only, and that requirement is specified as part of the subscription agreement, so the investor receives unit statements from the depository. And a fund cannot offer differential drawdown terms to investors in the same class — where the economics genuinely differ, the answer is a separate class of units, or a side letter.

The agreement is also why the trust is the dominant structure. An LLP receives contributions under the Limited Liability Partnership Act and a company under the Companies Act, 2013, where share application money and allotment are regulated concepts. AIF arrangements need more flexibility between investor, fund and manager than a company structure allows.

A worked example

Saraswati Credit Opportunities Fund, a Category II AIF, closes with a corpus of Rs 600 crore across 92 investors.

Ms Iyer commits Rs 5 crore. Her Contribution Agreement, signed by her, the trustee and the manager, fixes:

TermWhat her agreement says
Capital commitmentRs 5 crore
Class of unitsClass A1
Initial drawdown20% — Rs 1 crore, within 10 business days of notice
Management fee1.75% on committed capital during the commitment period
WaterfallEuropean, 10% preferred return, 20% additional return
Default in drawdownInterest at 15% p.a., then forfeiture of rights

A sovereign wealth fund in the same scheme commits Rs 150 crore and signs its own agreement, for Class A2 units at a 1.25% fee. Ms Iyer never sees it, and it never sees hers.

What she can work out from her own document: over an eight-year life, 1.75% on Rs 5 crore for a three-year commitment period and then on roughly Rs 3.9 crore of invested capital costs her about Rs 6 lakh, or 12% of her commitment, before a single rupee of carry.

What she cannot work out from it: whether the Rs 150 crore investor has a seat on the investment committee. That is the point of the document being bilateral, and the reason side letters carry the legal risk they do.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 13 (Legal Documentation and Negotiations), section 13.4, is the whole of it, and the Investor Charter in Annexure 13.1 puts 'entering into contribution agreement with investor' inside the on-boarding process and makes abiding by it an investor responsibility. Expect a parties question (who signs it), a 'which of these is a definitive agreement' question, and a distinguish-the-document question against the PPM and the IMA.

Common exam traps

  • Three parties sign it — the contributor, the trustee and the investment manager. The manager is not a bystander to it.
  • One per investor, and confidential. It is not a scheme-wide charter; the representations and warranties are investor-specific.
  • The PPM is disclosure, the Contribution Agreement is contract. A term in the PPM that is not carried into the agreement binds nobody.
  • Units are issued in demat mode only — that requirement lives in this agreement, not only in the regulations.
  • No differential drawdown terms inside a class. Differences go into a separate class of units, or a side letter, not into a quiet variation of the same class.
  • Do not confuse it with the Investment Management Agreement, which is signed once for the trust as a whole between the trustee and the manager, and not at the launch of each scheme.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-B

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it