All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Naturally short

Also written Natural short · Naturally short position · Short on raw materials

The position every business holds in its raw materials — it must buy them in future, so a price rise hurts it exactly as a short position would, and a long hedge cancels the exposure.

In plain language

A business that has to buy something later is already exposed to it, before it buys anything at all.

A jeweller who will need a kilogram of gold in August is hurt if gold gets dearer. He is better off if gold gets cheaper. That is the shape of a short position, and he never sold anything.

The workbook says it plainly. Any business or value chain participant is naturally short on raw materials and long on finished goods. They gain if raw material prices fall and lose when raw material prices rise.

So naturally short is the input side of every business.

The remedy is to go the other way. The hedger does not own the commodity but needs to acquire it in future, so he locks in the price he will pay by buying futures.

The workbook's own words for it: he is already naturally short on the underlying commodity because he must buy it in future, and he offsets this naturally short position by taking a long position in futures.

That is a long hedge.

How it works

The exposure. Commodity users use commodities as a raw material, and any business or value chain participant is naturally short on them: it gains if raw material prices fall and loses when they rise. The workbook groups such firms as commodity users — processors and consumers — as against commodity producers. Importers are given as a named case: importers need protection against price drops in the domestic market for goods they have pre-agreed to import, while exporters need protection against price increases on goods for which they hold export obligations at committed prices but have yet to procure domestically.

The hedge. In a long hedge the hedger does not own the underlying commodity but needs to acquire it in the future. He can lock in the price he will pay by buying, or going long in, futures contracts. In effect he is already naturally short, and he offsets that by taking a long futures position.

The two steps. If the hedger plans to buy a commodity in the spot market at a future date, he buys the futures contract now — step one — and then takes delivery against his futures position on the expiry date. Alternatively, if he manages to buy the commodity from the spot market in the interim, he may square off his futures contract.

With options instead. A naturally short buyer can also cap his purchase price with a call option, paying a premium instead of taking on a futures obligation. The workbook sets out the call option as a price-protection tool for hedgers against the possibility that market prices move against them.

One firm, both exposures. The naturally short input and the naturally long output sit on the same balance sheet. Hedgers generally hedge by buying raw materials in forwards or futures, selling finished goods in forwards or futures, or both.

Sizing the long. The number of lots comes from the hedge ratio — the correlation between spot and futures multiplied by the standard deviation of the change in spot price divided by the standard deviation of the change in futures price. The workbook's silver illustration gives spot standard deviation 1.17, futures standard deviation 0.62 and correlation 0.60, so a hedge ratio of 1.132258. On a 500 kilogram exposure that is an optimal hedge of 566.18 kilograms of futures and, at a silver lot of 30 kg, 19 lots rather than 17. The workbook adds a caution on that case: the 0.60 correlation is for explanation only, and in a liquid, transparent market the correlation, and therefore the hedge ratio, would generally be higher.

The naturally short sentence itself carries no figure; it is a statement of direction. The figures belong to the worked hedges beneath it.

A worked example

The workbook's own long hedge, which is the naturally short case in full.

A jeweller needs to buy 1 kilogram of gold at the end of July at Rs 50,000 per 10 grams to make his desired profit, and has provided Rs 50.00 lakh for it. He is naturally short gold: he must buy it, and a rise hurts him.

DateSpot marketFutures market
1 JuneNeeds 1 kg of gold at end-July at Rs 50,000 per 10 gAugust futures at Rs 50,400 per 10 g. He buys one August gold futures contract (1 contract = 1 kg)
End JulyGold is at Rs 51,600 per 10 g. He pays Rs 51.60 lakh for the kilogramAugust futures at Rs 52,000. He sells and squares off, profit Rs 1,60,000
ResultHigher cost in the spot market of Rs 1,60,000Profit in the futures market of Rs 1,60,000

The arithmetic on each leg, gold being quoted per 10 grams on a 1 kilogram lot of 100 quotation units:

Extra spot cost = (51,600 - 50,000) x 100 = Rs 1,60,000 Futures gain = (52,000 - 50,400) x 100 = Rs 1,60,000

Net effect nil. The jeweller's effective cost is back at his Rs 50.00 lakh plan, and his margin survives a Rs 1,600 per 10 gram move in gold.

Now the other path. Had gold fallen to Rs 48,500, he would have bought the kilogram for Rs 48.50 lakh — Rs 1.50 lakh cheaper — and given back roughly the same on the long futures. The hedge removes the rise and the fall.

And note the two possible endings the workbook allows. He squared off the futures because he bought the physical gold in the market. Had he not, he could instead have taken delivery against his long futures position on the expiry date and never gone to the spot market at all.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 5 (Uses of Commodity Derivatives), section 5.1 on hedging, where the naturally short and naturally long sentence appears, and section 5.2, which names the naturally short position explicitly while explaining the long hedge and works the gold example. Section 5.2.1 supplies the hedge ratio arithmetic, including the silver case.

Expect a direction question: a business is naturally ____ on its raw materials — short — and the paired remedy, that raw materials are hedged by buying futures, which is a long hedge. The workbook's own phrasing, that the hedger offsets his naturally short position by taking a long position in futures, is close to exam wording. A calculation question on the gold long hedge, ending at Rs 1,60,000 on both legs, is equally standard.

Common exam traps

  • Naturally short on raw materials, naturally long on finished goods. Two directions in one sentence, and reversing them inverts the hedge.
  • The hedge for a natural short is a LONG hedge — buying futures. Selling futures doubles the exposure.
  • You can be short without selling. The exposure arises from the obligation to buy later, not from any trade, which is why the workbook calls it natural.
  • It depends on the firm, not the commodity. Gold makes a jeweller naturally short and a miner naturally long.
  • Importers and exporters face it in opposite directions. Exporters with committed export prices and unprocured domestic goods need protection against a price rise; importers with pre-agreed import obligations need protection against a domestic price drop.
  • The hedge kills the benefit of a fall too. The jeweller who locked Rs 50,400 pays that whether gold goes to Rs 51,600 or Rs 48,500.
  • A hedge does not have to be one-for-one and can exceed 100%. The workbook's silver hedge ratio of 1.132258 turns a 500 kg exposure into 566.18 kg of futures, or 19 lots.
  • Two exits exist, not one. Square off the futures once the physical purchase is made, or take delivery against the long futures position at expiry.

Check yourself

  1. 1.A jeweller who must buy 1 kg of gold at the end of July hedges by buying August gold futures in June. What is this called and why does it work?

    1. a)A short hedge, because he sells his exposure to the futures market
    2. b)A long hedge — he is naturally short the commodity because he must buy it in future, and offsets this by going long futures
    3. c)An arbitrage, because he trades in both spot and futures markets
    4. d)A covered call, because he holds funds against the purchase
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) A long hedge — he is naturally short the commodity because he must buy it in future, and offsets this by going long futures

    "In the case of a LONG HEDGE, the hedger DOES NOT OWN THE UNDERLYING COMMODITY, BUT HE NEEDS TO ACQUIRE IT IN THE FUTURE. He can LOCK-IN THE PRICE that he will be paying in the future BY BUYING, OR GOING LONG IN FUTURES CONTRACTS. In effect, HE IS ALREADY NATURALLY SHORT on the underlying commodity BECAUSE HE MUST BUY IT IN FUTURE, and he OFFSETS THIS NATURALLY SHORT POSITION BY TAKING A LONG POSITION IN FUTURES."

    The workbook's numbers show the offset working:

    SpotFutures
    1st JuneNeeds gold at Rs 50,000 per 10 gmBuys August futures at Rs 50,400
    30th JuneGold at Rs 51,600 — pays Rs 1,60,000 moreSells at Rs 52,000 — profit Rs 1,60,000

    "The LOSS IN THE SPOT POSITION WAS OFFSET BY THE PROFIT MADE IN THE FUTURES POSITION."

    The phrase "naturally short" is the one to understand rather than memorise. The jeweller has sold nothing. But a rise in gold hurts him exactly as a short position would — because he must buy. Every business has such a position in its raw materials, and the hedge is always its mirror image.

    And the price of the protection: by hedging, "he would also have FOREGONE THE POSSIBILITY OF A GAIN FROM ANY PRICE INCREASE." Had gold fallen, the futures loss would have cancelled his cheaper purchase.

  2. 2.An FMCG company making milk biscuits needs wheat, sugar and milk. It fears a deficit monsoon will push agricultural raw material prices up. How does the workbook suggest it could use index futures?

    1. a)Short sell agricultural commodity index futures, since a deficit monsoon lowers prices
    2. b)Buy metal index futures, since it has a natural short position in metals
    3. c)Take no position, since index futures cannot be used for hedging
    4. d)Buy agricultural commodity index futures in advance, using them as a proxy for monsoon derivatives
    Show the answer

    Answer: (d) Buy agricultural commodity index futures in advance, using them as a proxy for monsoon derivatives

    "As 'PROXY OF MONSOON' derivatives: An agricultural commodity futures index may be considered as a proxy of monsoon derivatives to some extent, THOUGH IT MAY NOT HAVE PERFECT CORRELATION with the performance of the monsoon. A food production company or an FMCG company may require several agricultural commodities... For example, production on MILK BISCUITS require raw materials such as WHEAT, SUGAR, MILK, etc... If there are worries of DEFICIT MONSOON... then such FMCG companies MAY BUY THE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY INDEX FUTURES in advance to meet such an eventuality."

    The company is naturally short its raw materials, so it hedges by going long.

    Why the other options are wrong:

    • (a) A deficit monsoon threatens higher prices. Short selling the agri index is what a trader does when he expects a very good monsoon and surplus supply.
    • (b) Buying metal index futures is the workbook's example for a construction company that needs different metals. The biscuit maker's exposure is agricultural.
    • (c) The workbook lists hedging first among the uses of index futures.
  3. 3.What is the natural market position of any business or value chain participant?

    1. a)Long on raw materials and short on finished goods
    2. b)Naturally short on raw materials and long on finished goods
    3. c)Neutral on both, until they choose to hedge
    4. d)Long on both raw materials and finished goods
    Show the answer

    Answer: (b) Naturally short on raw materials and long on finished goods

    ⚠️ "FOR ANY BUSINESS OR VALUE CHAIN PARTICIPANT, THEY ARE NATURALLY SHORT ON RAW MATERIALS AND LONG ON FINISHED GOODS."

    Unpacked: ⚠️ "IT MEANS THEY GAIN IF RAW MATERIAL PRICES REDUCE, AND THEY LOSE WHEN RAW MATERIAL PRICES INCREASE. SIMILARLY, ON FINISHED GOODS, THEY GAIN WHEN THEIR PRICES RISE, AND THEY LOSE WHEN THEIR PRICES FALL."

    And the hedge follows mechanically: ⚠️ "HENCE, HEDGERS GENERALLY HEDGE BY BUYING RAW MATERIALS IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS OR SELLING FINISHED GOODS IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS OR BOTH."

    ⚠️ Option (c) is the assumption to correct. A business does not choose its exposure — the business gives it. A miller who has bought no wheat and sold no flour is still exposed to both prices. The hedge does not create a position; it cancels one that already exists.

    Which is why the same commodity is hedged in opposite directions by different participants: a farmer hedges declining crop prices, while a food processor hedges increasing raw material costs — same wheat, opposite sides of it.

    The definition to remember: "HEDGING IMPLIES TAKING POSITION IN FUTURES MARKETS IN SUCH A WAY THAT OVERALL NET MARKET RISK IS MINIMIZED OR MITIGATED."

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XVI

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it