All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

NISM Series IFSCA-01 · Chapter 8: Financial Action Task Force and Its Recommendations on AML and CFT

L1 · Foundation

The Financial Action Task Force and its Recommendations

FATF as a 40-member body, the Plenary, the grey and black lists, the Presidency, the open-ended mandate, the 40 Recommendations across seven areas, the IX Special Recommendations on terrorist financing, the nine FATF-Style Regional Bodies, and trade-based money laundering — the three ways value moves, why the international trade system is attractive, the four basic techniques and the black market peso exchange, and the three steps to improve national capacity.

22 min read · Worth 12% of the paper · Written from pages 119–135 of the official NISM workbook · Updated 18 September 2026

What this chapter covers

Chapter 8 carries 6 marks out of 50 — 12% of the paper.

Learning Objective- After studying this chapter, you should know about: Purpose of formation of FATF and initiatives taken by it to protect the global financial system from being exploited for illicit activities · The concept, process and preventive measures to be taken for Trade-based Money Laundering.

8.1 Introduction to FATF

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) leads global action to tackle money laundering, terrorist and proliferation financing. The 40-member body sets international standards to ensure national authorities can effectively go after illicit funds linked to drugs trafficking, the illicit arms trade, cyber fraud and other serious crimes.

Forty members — and coincidentally forty Recommendations. Keep the two figures apart.

Its three functions: the FATF researches how money is laundered and terrorism is funded, promotes global standards to mitigate the risks, and assesses whether countries are taking effective action.

Reach: in total, more than 200 countries and jurisdictions have committed to implement the FATF's Standards as part of a co-ordinated global response to preventing organised crime, corruption and terrorism.

Who assesses: countries and jurisdictions are assessed with the help of nine FATF Associate Member organisations and other global partners, the IMF and World Bank.

Nine Associate Members — the FATF-Style Regional Bodies of section 8.4.

The decision-making body: the FATF's decision-making body, the FATF Plenary, meets three times per year and holds countries to account if they do not comply with the Standards.

And the consequence of persistent failure: if a country repeatedly fails to implement FATF Standards then it can be named a Jurisdiction under Increased Monitoring or a High Risk Jurisdiction. These are often externally referred to as "the grey and black lists".

The two lists

Grey List- When the FATF places a jurisdiction under increased monitoring, it means the country has committed to resolve swiftly the identified strategic deficiencies within agreed timeframes and is subject to increased monitoring. This list is often externally referred to as the "grey list".

Note what grey listing signifies — a commitment to fix the problem, with monitoring, not a call for sanctions.

Black List- For all countries identified as high-risk by FATF, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country. This list is often externally referred to as the "black list".

Two levels of response there — enhanced due diligence generally, and counter-measures in the most serious cases.

In plain words: a grey-listed country has promised to fix its gaps and is being watched. A black-listed country is high risk, so everyone dealing with it must take extra care.

These lists are what the earlier chapters refer to. Chapter 6 lists as a high-risk factor jurisdictions with relatively high levels of corruption, organized crime or inadequate AML/CFT measures, as identified by the FATF; Chapter 5 requires caution with respondent banks in jurisdictions which have strategic deficiencies or have not made sufficient progress in implementation of FATF Recommendations; and Chapter 2 records that the IFSCA exemption for a group service provider applies only where it is not in FATF high-risk jurisdictions.

8.1.1 The FATF President

The FATF President is a senior official appointed by the FATF Plenary from among its members. In April 2019, the revised Mandate extended the terms of the FATF Presidency to a two-year period.

The term of the President begins on 1 July and ends on 30 June two years after assuming office.

Duties: the President convenes and chairs the meetings of the FATF Plenary and the Steering Group. The FATF Executive Secretary and FATF Secretariat staff are responsible to and act under the instructions of the President... The President is the principal spokesperson for the FATF and represents the FATF externally.

Elisa de Anda Madrazo of Mexico is the FATF President from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2026. She succeeded Mr. T. Raja Kumar of Singapore.

The FATF Vice-President, is appointed by the Plenary from among its members and assists the President in carrying out his/her responsibilities. Giles Thomson of the United Kingdom assumed his role as Vice-President of the FATF on July 1, 2025.

8.1.2 The mandate

Money laundering, terrorist financing and the financing of weapons of mass destruction are enduring concerns for the integrity of the financial system. They require a sustained political commitment to fight these threats.

This is why, in 2019, FATF Ministers gave the FATF an open-ended mandate after three decades of operation under a time-bound mandate. In 2001, the FATF expanded its mandate to also combat terrorist financing.

Two dates: 2001 for terrorist financing, 2019 for the open-ended mandate. Chapter 1 supplies the third — FATF was founded in 1989 with the initiative of the 1989 G7 Summit in Paris.

8.2 The 40 Recommendations

The FATF Recommendations provide a comprehensive framework of measures to help countries tackle illicit financial flows. These include a robust framework of laws, regulations and operational measures to ensure national authorities can take effective action to detect and disrupt financial flows that fuel crime and terrorism, and punish those responsible for illegal activity.

The 40 Recommendations are divided into seven distinct areas:

  • AML/CFT Policies and coordination.
  • Money laundering and confiscation.
  • Terrorist financing and financing of proliferation.
  • Preventive measures.
  • Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons and arrangements.
  • Powers and responsibilities of competent authorities and other institutional measures.
  • International cooperation.

Seven areas, labelled A to G.

A — AML/CFT policies and coordination

No.Recommendation
1Assessing risks & applying a risk-based approach
2National cooperation and coordination

B — Money laundering and confiscation

No.Recommendation
3Money laundering offence
4Confiscation and provisional measures

C — Terrorist financing and financing of proliferation

No.Recommendation
5Terrorist financing offence
6Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing
7Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
8Non-profit organisations

D — Preventive measures

No.Recommendation
9Financial institution secrecy laws
10Customer due diligence
11Record keeping
12Politically exposed persons
13Correspondent banking
14Money or value transfer services
15New technologies
16Payment transparency
17Reliance on third parties
18Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
19Higher-risk countries
20Reporting of suspicious transactions
21Tipping-off and confidentiality
22DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
23DNFBPs: Other measures

Recommendations 10 to 21 cover the same ground as much of Chapters 5 and 6. They deal with customer due diligence, record keeping, PEPs, correspondent banking, new technologies, third-party reliance, higher-risk countries, STR reporting and tipping-off, in that order.

E — Transparency and beneficial ownership

No.Recommendation
24Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
25Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements

F — Powers and responsibilities of competent authorities

No.Recommendation
26Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
27Powers of supervisors
28Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
29Financial intelligence units
30Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
31Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
32Cash couriers
33Statistics
34Guidance and feedback
35Sanctions

G — International cooperation

No.Recommendation
36International instruments
37Mutual legal assistance
38Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
39Extradition
40Other forms of international cooperation

A note on the table: the 'old number' column refers to the corresponding 2003 FATF Recommendation. Version as adopted on 15 February 2012.

And on terminology: the FATF Recommendations are also often referred to as the FATF Standards, which comprise the Recommendations themselves and their Interpretive Notes, together with the applicable definitions in the Glossary.

Three components of the Standards — Recommendations, Interpretive Notes and Glossary.

Implementation is not uniform: as countries have diverse legal, administrative and operational frameworks and different financial systems, they should adapt the implementation of the Recommendations to their particular circumstances.

8.3 The IX Special Recommendations

Recognising the vital importance of taking action to combat the financing of terrorism, the FATF has agreed these Recommendations, which, when combined with the FATF Forty Recommendations on money laundering, set out the basic framework to detect, prevent and suppress the financing of terrorism and terrorist acts.

The 40+9 Recommendations, together with their interpretative notes, provide the international standards for combating money laundering (ML) and terrorist financing (TF).

The nine at a glance:

No.Special RecommendationThe workbook's words
IRatification and implementation of UN instrumentseach country should take immediate steps to ratify and to implement fully the 1999 United Nations International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, and should immediately implement the United Nations resolutions relating to the prevention and suppression of the financing of terrorist acts, particularly United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373.
IICriminalising the financing of terrorism and associated money launderingeach country should criminalise the financing of terrorism, terrorist acts and terrorist organisations. Countries should ensure that such offences are designated as money laundering predicate offences.
IIIFreezing and confiscating terrorist assetseach country should implement measures to freeze without delay funds or other assets of terrorists, those who finance terrorism and terrorist organisations in accordance with the United Nations resolutions, and should enable the competent authorities to seize and confiscate property that is the proceeds of, or used in, or intended or allocated for use in, the financing of terrorism.
IVReporting suspicious transactions related to terrorismif financial institutions, or other businesses or entities subject to anti-money laundering obligations, suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are linked or related to, or are to be used for terrorism, terrorist acts or by terrorist organisations, they should be required to report promptly their suspicions to the competent authorities.
VInternational Co-operationeach country should afford another country, on the basis of a treaty, arrangement or other mechanism for mutual legal assistance or information exchange, the greatest possible measure of assistance; and countries should also take all possible measures to ensure that they do not provide safe havens for individuals charged with the financing of terrorism... and should have procedures in place to extradite, where possible, such individuals.
VIAlternative Remittancepersons or entities that provide a service for the transmission of money or value, including transmission through an informal money or value transfer system or network, should be licensed or registered and subject to all the FATF Recommendations that apply to banks and non-bank financial institutions, with sanctions for those operating illegally.
VIIWire transferscountries should require financial institutions to include accurate and meaningful originator information (name, address and account number) on funds transfers and related messages that are sent, and the information should remain with the transfer or related message through the payment chain; and to conduct enhanced scrutiny of and monitor for suspicious activity funds transfers which do not contain complete originator information.
VIIINon-profit organisationscountries should review the adequacy of laws and regulations that relate to entities that can be abused for the financing of terrorism. Non-profit organisations are particularly vulnerable, and countries should ensure that they cannot be misused: (i) by terrorist organisations posing as legitimate entities; (ii) to exploit legitimate entities as conduits for terrorist financing, including for the purpose of escaping asset freezing measures; and (iii) to conceal or obscure the clandestine diversion of funds intended for legitimate purposes to terrorist organisations.
IXCash Courierscountries should have measures in place to detect the physical cross-border transportation of currency and bearer negotiable instruments, including a declaration system or other disclosure obligation; competent authorities should have the legal authority to stop or restrain currency or bearer negotiable instruments that are suspected to be related to terrorist financing or money laundering, or that are falsely declared or disclosed; and there should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for false declarations, with confiscation where the instruments relate to terrorist financing or money laundering.

Links worth noticing.

  • II asks that terrorist financing be a predicate offence. Compare paragraph 4 of Part A of India's Schedule, which lists UAPA offences (Chapter 4).
  • III says freeze without delay. Compare Chapter 5's duty to block, reject or freeze assets of these terrorists or terrorist entities immediately.
  • IV uses the words suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect. The IFSCA Guidelines use the same test for internal reporting.
  • VI brings informal money or value transfer systems under the same rules as banks.
  • VII requires name, address and account number to travel with a transfer. Compare the wire transfer rules in Chapter 5 and the ban on stripping payment messages.
  • VIII names three misuses of non-profit organisations — the front, the conduit and the diversion. Compare the separate NPO limb in Rule 3 and the DARPAN Portal of NITI Aayog registration.

A note on "8" and "IX". The workbook uses both numbers. Section 8.5 quotes FATF's move to extend the 8 Special Recommendations on terrorist financing to cover cash couriers. Section 8.3 lists IX Special Recommendations, the ninth being Cash Couriers. Learn the list as nine, with cash couriers as number IX.

And the unifying principle: the cornerstone of the FATF 40+9 Recommendations is the risk-based approach which emphasizes the need for countries to identify and understand the money laundering and terrorist financing risks they are exposed to. This ensures they can prioritise their resources to mitigate risks in the highest risk areas.

The risk-based approach is the cornerstone. Chapter 5 says something similar when it calls the RBA the primary thrust of these guidelines.

The FATF continuously monitors new and evolving threats to the financial system and regularly updates and refines its Recommendations, and to help countries implement its Standards, the FATF also creates guidance and best practice papers on range of issues.

8.4 FATF-Style Regional Bodies

Nine FATF-Style Regional Bodies have been established:

BodyBased at
Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)Sydney, Australia
Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF)Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
Eurasian Group (EAG)Moscow, Russia
Eastern & Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG)Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Central Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (GABAC)Libreville, Gabon
Latin America Anti-Money Laundering Group (GAFILAT)Buenos Aires, Argentina
West Africa Money Laundering Group (GIABA)Dakar, Senegal
Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF)Manama, Bahrain
Council of Europe Anti-Money Laundering Group (MONEYVAL)Strasbourg, France (Council of Europe)

India is a member of two of these bodies — the APG, the Asia/Pacific Group, and the EAG, the Eurasian Group, as Chapter 1 records.

The APG, in conjunction with the FATF and the other eight regional bodies, constitute a global network to combat money laundering, the financing of terrorism and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The FATF's 40 recommendations are the principal standards to combat these crimes.

And the summary: FATF promotes sharing of best practices, guides reforms in member and non-member states, and updates standards to address risks from emerging threats such as cryptocurrencies and proliferation financing. FATF's framework is widely adopted, boosting the transparency of financial systems, making it harder for criminals and terrorists to move, hide, or use funds undetected.

8.5 Trade-based money laundering

Trade-based money laundering is defined as the process of disguising the proceeds of crime and moving value through the use of trade transactions in an attempt to legitimise their illicit origins.

The first sample question asks for this by name.

There are three main methods by which criminal organisations and terrorist financiers move money for the purpose of disguising its origins and integrating it into the formal economy.

MethodThe workbook's words
i. Financial systemThe first involves the movement of value through the financial system using methods such as cheques and wire transfers;
ii. Physical cashThe second involves the physical movement of banknotes using methods such as cash couriers and bulk cash smuggling; and
iii. TradeThe third involves the movement of value using methods such as the false documentation and declaration of traded goods and services.

Three channels — the financial system, physical cash, and trade documents.

Each of these methods involves the movement of enormous volumes of funds and can operate at a domestic or international level. In recent years, the Financial Action Task Force has focused considerable attention on the first two of these methods. By comparison, the scope for abuse of the international trade system has received relatively little attention.

The history: in 2003, the FATF significantly toughened the standards that apply to the financial system and various non-financial intermediaries. Two years later, it extended these standards to cover the activities of cash couriers. To date, however, limited attention has been focused on trade-related activities.

And the consequence of tightening two channels but not the third: research has shown that when governments take action against certain methods of money laundering or terrorist financing, criminal activities tend to migrate to other methods. In part, this reflects the fact that more aggressive policy actions and enforcement measures increase the risk of detection and therefore raise the economic cost of using these methods.

This suggests that the FATF's recent actions to revise the 40 Recommendations on money laundering and extend the 8 Special Recommendations on terrorist financing to cover cash couriers, as well as the ongoing efforts of countries to implement these stricter standards, may have the unintended effect of increasing the attractiveness of the international trade system for money laundering and terrorist financing activities.

Displacement, not elimination. Squeeze two channels and the third grows.

8.6 The international trade system

The international trade system is subject to a wide range of risks and vulnerabilities, which provide criminal organisations with the opportunity to launder the proceeds of crime and provide funding to terrorist organisations, with a relatively low risk of detection.

The relative attractiveness of the international trade system is associated with:

Factor
1The enormous volume of trade flows, which obscures individual transactions and provides abundant opportunity for criminal organisations to transfer value across borders;
2The complexity associated with (often multiple) foreign exchange transactions and recourse to diverse financing arrangements;
3The additional complexity that can arise from the practice of commingling illicit funds with the cash flows of legitimate businesses;
4The limited recourse to verification procedures or programs to exchange customs data between countries; and
5The limited resources that most customs agencies have available to detect illegal trade transactions.

In plain words: trade is huge, complicated, mixed with honest business, poorly shared between countries, and thinly checked.

Five reasons. The second sample question is built directly on them — the correct answer being the limited resources available for detection of illegal trades, while the distractors invert the others.

On the last point: research suggests that most customs agencies inspect less than 5 percent of all cargo shipments entering or leaving their jurisdictions. In addition, most custom agencies are able to direct relatively limited analytical resources to improved targeting and identification of suspicious trade transactions.

Less than 5 per cent inspected.

The scale: in recent decades, international trade has grown significantly: global merchandise trade now exceeds US$9 trillion a year and global trade in services accounts for a further US$2 trillion. Much of this trade is associated with the financial system, as a significant amount of goods and services are financed by banks and other financial institutions.

US$9 trillion in goods, US$2 trillion in services.

In industrial countries the growth of trade has significantly exceeded the growth of gross domestic product, while in developing countries it has increased even faster. In addition, virtually all economies have become more open to trade. This has placed increasing pressure on the limited resources that most countries, especially developing countries, have available to scrutinise these activities.

8.6.1 Abuse of the trade system — three related activities

ActivityThe workbook's words
a) Tax Avoidance and Evasionthe differing tax rates have an impact on the incentives of corporations to shift taxable income from jurisdictions with relatively high tax rates to jurisdictions with relatively low tax rates in order to minimise income tax payments.
b) Capital Flightcompanies and individuals also shift money from one country to another to diversify risk and protect their wealth against the impact of financial or political crises. And a common technique used to circumvent currency restrictions is to over-invoice imports or under invoice exports.

The third sample question tests this definition — capital flight.

c) Trade-Based Money Laundering — unlike tax avoidance and capital flight, which usually involve the transfer of legitimately earned funds across borders, capital movements relating to money laundering – or trade-based money laundering – involve the proceeds of crime, which are more difficult to track.

The distinguishing feature is the source of the money. Tax avoidance and capital flight move legitimately earned funds. Trade-based money laundering moves the proceeds of crime.

A number of studies have analyzed techniques to establish whether reported import and export prices reflect fair market values. One of the methods currently being explored involves the use of statistical techniques to detect discrepancies in the information provided on shipping documents.

8.6.2 The four basic techniques

The basic techniques of trade-based money laundering include: over- and under-invoicing of goods and services; multiple invoicing of goods and services; over- and under-shipments of goods and services; and falsely described goods and services.

However, it may be noted that all of these techniques are not necessarily in use in every country.

a) Over- and Under-Invoicing. Money laundering through the over- and under-invoicing of goods and services, which is one of the oldest methods of fraudulently transferring value across borders, remains a common practice today. The key element of this technique is the misrepresentation of the price of the good or service in order to transfer additional value between the importer and exporter.

Which direction the value moves depends on which way the price is wrong:

Invoice priceEffect in the workbook's words
Below fair market pricethe exporter is able to transfer value to the importer, as the payment for the good or service will be lower than the value that the importer receives when it is sold on the open market.
Above fair market pricethe exporter is able to receive value from the importer, as the payment for the good or service is higher than the value that the importer will receive when it is sold on the open market.

Under-invoice to move value to the importer; over-invoice to move value to the exporter.

b) Multiple Invoicing. Another technique used to launder funds involves issuing more than one invoice for the same international trade transaction. By invoicing the same good or service more than once, a money launderer or terrorist financier is able to justify multiple payments for the same shipment of goods or delivery of services. Employing a number of different financial institutions to make these additional payments can further increase the level of complexity surrounding such transactions.

Note that no false pricing is needed — each invoice may be accurate. Only the repetition is wrong, and spreading the payments across banks hides it further.

c) Over- and Under-Shipments. A money launderer can overstate or understate the quantity of goods being shipped or services being provided. In the extreme, an exporter may not ship any goods at all, but simply collude with an importer to ensure that all shipping and customs documents associated with this so called "phantom shipment" are routinely processed. Banks and other financial institutions may unknowingly be involved in the provision of trade financing for these phantom shipments.

The phantom shipment — documents without goods, and a bank financing nothing at all.

d) Falsely Described Goods and Services. A money launderer can misrepresent the quality or type of a good or service. For example, an exporter may ship a relatively inexpensive good and falsely invoice it as a more expensive item or an entirely different item. This creates a discrepancy between what appears on the shipping and customs documents and what is actually shipped.

And services are harder still: the use of false descriptions can also be used in the trade in services, such as financial advice, consulting services and market research. In practice, the fair market value of these services can present additional valuation difficulties.

A consultancy fee has no market price to compare against.

8.6.3 Complex techniques

In practice, strategies to launder money usually combine several different techniques. Often these involve abuse of both the financial and international trade systems.

Black market peso exchange arrangements is one such Complex Trade-based Money Laundering technique that provides a useful illustration of how a number of different money laundering techniques can be combined into a single criminal operation. These transactions combine a number of different illegal activities, such as drug smuggling, money laundering through the financial system and trade-based money laundering.

What makes it different: unlike the basic trade-based money laundering techniques discussed above, there is also no need for the importer and exporter to collude in a fraudulent transaction for the black market peso exchange arrangement to work. Instead, the prices and quantities of the goods can be correctly reported to customs agencies and value can still be transferred across borders.

No collusion, no false documents — and value still crosses the border. That is what makes it hard to detect through document checks alone.

Although the term "black market peso exchange" refers to a money laundering technique that was originally associated with Colombian narcotics trafficking, these arrangements are widely used in many countries to repatriate the proceeds of various types of crimes.

8.6.4 Current practices and the way forward

To examine the capacity of national authorities to combat trade-based money laundering, the FATF project team has made use of a detailed questionnaire to survey current practices in a range of countries. This questionnaire focuses on the ability of various government agencies to identify suspicious activities related to trade transactions, to share this information with domestic and foreign partner agencies, and to act on this information.

Five kinds of agency were studied: customs agencies, law enforcement agencies, financial intelligence units, tax authorities and banking supervisors.

Three practical steps follow:

StepThe workbook's words
a) Building Better Awarenessthere was almost unanimous agreement on the need for a stronger focus on training programs for competent authorities... to better identify trade-based money laundering techniques. In turn, improved training could result in substantial increases in the number of suspicious transaction reports filed with financial intelligence units. In addition, such training programs could be usefully supplemented by outreach sessions to the private sector.
b) Strengthening Current Measuresthe simplest is to ensure that competent authorities and financial institutions have access to the case studies and red flag indicators in this study. In addition, most countries would benefit from more effective information sharing among competent authorities at the domestic level. For example, it would be useful if law enforcement agencies could seek information from customs agencies on specific trade transactions in advance of a full-fledged criminal investigation.
c) Improving International Co-operationcountries need to work cooperatively to identify and combat trade-based money laundering. Consistent with FATF standards, countries could put clear and effective gateways in place to facilitate the prompt and constructive exchange of information. In practice, this may require broader use of memoranda of understanding and mutual legal assistance treaties between countries to facilitate the sharing of information related to specific transactions. It also means greater recourse to mutual assistance agreements between customs agencies to facilitate the exchange of export and import data in order to identify trade anomalies that may indicate potential trade-based money laundering abuses.

In plain words: train people, share what is already known at home, and build channels to share trade data with other countries.

The fourth sample question is built on this paragraph — the effective measure is establishing clear information-sharing gateways through MOUs, Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties, and customs-to-customs cooperation for exchange of trade data.

Note why the distractors fail. Raising customs duties does nothing about document fraud. Investigating alone is the opposite of cooperation. And limiting reporting to domestic institutions ignores that the value crosses borders.

Additional reading listed by the workbook

  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on International Financial Services Centres Authority (Anti Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorist Financing and Know Your Customer) Guidelines, 2022.
  • UAPA Order - Gazette Notification 4391(E) dated October 10, 2024.
  • UBO Identification dated September 08, 2023.

Think of it like this

Grey list and black list — a warning and a sanction

A school may put a student on report, or it may suspend him. The FATF has the same two levels.

If a country repeatedly fails to implement FATF Standards then it can be named a Jurisdiction under Increased Monitoring or a High Risk Jurisdiction. These are often externally referred to as "the grey and black lists".

Grey — increased monitoring, with a promise to fix things. When the FATF places a jurisdiction under increased monitoring, it means the country has committed to resolve swiftly the identified strategic deficiencies within agreed timeframes and is subject to increased monitoring.

Note the two elements — a commitment by the country, and agreed timeframes. Grey listing is cooperative.

Black — a call to the rest of the world. For all countries identified as high-risk by FATF, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country.

Two escalating responses within the black list itself — enhanced due diligence for all high-risk countries, and counter-measures in the most serious cases.

Who decides: the FATF's decision-making body, the FATF Plenary, meets three times per year and holds countries to account if they do not comply with the Standards.

Three meetings a year.

These listings do real work throughout this syllabus. Chapter 2 records that IFSCA's exemption for a same-group service provider applies only where it is not in FATF high-risk jurisdictions. Chapter 3 makes it a condition of third-party reliance that the third party is not based in a country or jurisdiction assessed as high risk. Chapter 5 requires caution with respondent banks located in jurisdictions which have strategic deficiencies or have not made sufficient progress in implementation of FATF Recommendations. And Chapter 6 makes it a high-risk factor that a jurisdiction has inadequate AML/CFT measures, as identified by the FATF, requiring enhanced measures from countries for which this is called for by the FATF.

So a listing decision taken at a Plenary meeting changes what a GIFT City compliance officer must do the following week.

And assessments are not FATF's alone: countries and jurisdictions are assessed with the help of nine FATF Associate Member organisations and other global partners, the IMF and World Bank.

Everything in Chapters 5 and 6 has a Recommendation number

The IFSCA Guidelines did not invent their structure. Read the list of Recommendations 10 to 21 and the whole of the preventive-measures chapter appears in order.

10 Customer due diligence · 11 Record keeping · 12 Politically exposed persons · 13 Correspondent banking · 14 Money or value transfer services · 15 New technologies · 16 Payment transparency · 17 Reliance on third parties · 18 Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries · 19 Higher-risk countries · 20 Reporting of suspicious transactions · 21 Tipping-off and confidentiality.

Every one of those has a chapter or clause in the IFSCA Guidelines — CDD, record keeping, PEPs, correspondent banking, new technologies, third-party reliance, higher-risk countries, STR reporting, and the confidentiality that forbids tipping off.

Which is exactly what Chapter 6 says: given the international focus of IFSCA, its AML/CFT guidelines align closely with the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the global standard-setter for combating illicit financial flows.

And Chapter 1: following the PMLA and the overall FATF Recommendations, IFSCA has issued the IFSCA (Anti Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorist Financing and Know Your Customer) Guidelines, 2022.

The seven areas give the overall shape: AML/CFT Policies and coordination · Money laundering and confiscation · Terrorist financing and financing of proliferation · Preventive measures · Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons and arrangements · Powers and responsibilities of competent authorities and other institutional measures · International cooperation.

Note Recommendation 1 — Assessing risks & applying a risk-based approach — which comes first for a reason. The cornerstone of the FATF 40+9 Recommendations is the risk-based approach which emphasizes the need for countries to identify and understand the money laundering and terrorist financing risks they are exposed to.

The same phrase Chapter 5 uses of the IFSCA Guidelines: the RBA is the primary thrust of these guidelines.

Recommendation 29 explains FIU-IND's existence, Recommendations 24 and 25 the beneficial ownership rules, and Recommendation 32 the cash courier controls that also form Special Recommendation IX.

And the Standards are more than the list: the FATF Recommendations are also often referred to as the FATF Standards, which comprise the Recommendations themselves and their Interpretive Notes, together with the applicable definitions in the Glossary.

Three doors — and closing two widens the third

Water finds the lowest gap in a wall. So does criminal money.

There are three main methods by which criminal organisations and terrorist financiers move money for the purpose of disguising its origins and integrating it into the formal economy.

i. The first involves the movement of value through the financial system using methods such as cheques and wire transfers;

ii. The second involves the physical movement of banknotes using methods such as cash couriers and bulk cash smuggling; and

iii. The third involves the movement of value using methods such as the false documentation and declaration of traded goods and services.

Two of the three have been tightened. In 2003, the FATF significantly toughened the standards that apply to the financial system and various non-financial intermediaries. Two years later, it extended these standards to cover the activities of cash couriers. To date, however, limited attention has been focused on trade-related activities.

And the effect is predictable: research has shown that when governments take action against certain methods of money laundering or terrorist financing, criminal activities tend to migrate to other methods. In part, this reflects the fact that more aggressive policy actions and enforcement measures increase the risk of detection and therefore raise the economic cost of using these methods.

The workbook draws the conclusion openly: the FATF's tightening of the financial and cash-courier routes may have the unintended effect of increasing the attractiveness of the international trade system for money laundering and terrorist financing activities.

Why trade is attractive — five reasons: the enormous volume of trade flows, which obscures individual transactions; the complexity associated with (often multiple) foreign exchange transactions and recourse to diverse financing arrangements; commingling illicit funds with the cash flows of legitimate businesses; the limited recourse to verification procedures or programs to exchange customs data between countries; and the limited resources that most customs agencies have available to detect illegal trade transactions.

With a striking figure: most customs agencies inspect less than 5 percent of all cargo shipments entering or leaving their jurisdictions.

And the volume to hide within: global merchandise trade now exceeds US$9 trillion a year and global trade in services accounts for a further US$2 trillion.

For an IFSC entity this is not academic — these centres exist for cross-border business, and much of world trade is financed by banks and other financial institutions.

Four techniques, four different lies — and one that tells none

A trade has a price, a count, a quantity and a description. Each can be falsified, and each falsification is a technique.

Over- and under-invoicing — the price is wrong. The key element of this technique is the misrepresentation of the price of the good or service in order to transfer additional value between the importer and exporter.

And the direction is determined by which way: by invoicing the good or service at a price below the "fair market" price, the exporter is able to transfer value to the importer; by invoicing the good or service at a price above the fair market price, the exporter is able to receive value from the importer.

Under-invoice to move value to the importer; over-invoice to move it to the exporter. It is one of the oldest methods of fraudulently transferring value across borders.

Multiple invoicing — the count is wrong. By invoicing the same good or service more than once, a money launderer or terrorist financier is able to justify multiple payments for the same shipment of goods or delivery of services, and employing a number of different financial institutions to make these additional payments can further increase the level of complexity.

Each invoice may be perfectly priced. Only the repetition is false — which is why a single bank sees nothing wrong.

Over- and under-shipment — the quantity is wrong. In the extreme, an exporter may not ship any goods at all, but simply collude with an importer to ensure that all shipping and customs documents associated with this so called "phantom shipment" are routinely processed. And banks and other financial institutions may unknowingly be involved in the provision of trade financing for these phantom shipments.

Falsely described goods — the description is wrong. An exporter may ship a relatively inexpensive good and falsely invoice it as a more expensive item or an entirely different item, creating a discrepancy between what appears on the shipping and customs documents and what is actually shipped. Services are worse, since the fair market value of these services can present additional valuation difficulties for financial advice, consulting services and market research.

Then the technique that lies about nothing at all. In a black market peso exchange arrangement, there is also no need for the importer and exporter to collude in a fraudulent transaction... Instead, the prices and quantities of the goods can be correctly reported to customs agencies and value can still be transferred across borders.

Document checking alone will not find it — which is why the way forward is training, domestic information sharing and mutual assistance agreements between customs agencies to facilitate the exchange of export and import data in order to identify trade anomalies.

And a caution for the paper: all of these techniques are not necessarily in use in every country.

Key terms in this chapter

Attractiveness of the international trade system
Five factors — the enormous volume of trade flows obscuring individual transactions; the complexity of multiple foreign exchange transactions and diverse financing; commingling of illicit funds with legitimate business cash flows; limited verification and exchange of customs data between countries; and the limited resources customs agencies have for detection, with under 5 per cent of cargo inspected.
Black list
The informal name for the list of High Risk Jurisdictions, in respect of which FATF urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence and, in the most serious cases, calls for counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ML, TF and PF risks emanating from that country.
Black market peso exchange
A complex trade-based laundering arrangement, originally associated with Colombian narcotics trafficking and now used widely, combining drug smuggling, laundering through the financial system and trade-based laundering. It requires no collusion between importer and exporter, and prices and quantities can be correctly reported to customs while value still crosses borders.
Capital flight
The shifting of money from one country to another by companies and individuals to diversify risk and protect wealth against financial or political crises — commonly effected by over-invoicing imports or under-invoicing exports to circumvent currency restrictions, and involving legitimately earned funds rather than proceeds of crime.
FATF
The Financial Action Task Force, a 40-member body founded in 1989 that leads global action against money laundering, terrorist and proliferation financing — researching how money is laundered, promoting global standards, and assessing whether countries take effective action. More than 200 countries and jurisdictions have committed to its Standards.
FATF open-ended mandate
Given by FATF Ministers in 2019 after three decades of operation under a time-bound mandate, recognising the need for continued global leadership against abuse of the financial system. The mandate had been expanded in 2001 to cover terrorist financing.
FATF Plenary
The FATF's decision-making body, which meets three times per year and holds countries to account for non-compliance with the Standards, including by naming them Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring or High Risk Jurisdictions.
FATF President
A senior official appointed by the Plenary from among its members, serving a two-year term from 1 July to 30 June, who convenes and chairs the Plenary and Steering Group, directs the Executive Secretary and Secretariat, and is the FATF's principal spokesperson. Elisa de Anda Madrazo of Mexico holds the office from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2026, succeeding T. Raja Kumar of Singapore.
FATF Standards
The Recommendations themselves together with their Interpretive Notes and the applicable definitions in the Glossary. Countries with diverse legal, administrative and operational frameworks should adapt implementation to their particular circumstances.
FATF-Style Regional Bodies
The nine regional bodies that with the FATF form the global network — APG (Sydney), CFATF (Port of Spain), EAG (Moscow), ESAAMLG (Dar es Salaam), GABAC (Libreville), GAFILAT (Buenos Aires), GIABA (Dakar), MENAFATF (Manama) and MONEYVAL (Strasbourg). India belongs to the APG.
Grey list
The informal name for the list of Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring — countries that have committed to resolve swiftly identified strategic deficiencies within agreed timeframes and are subject to increased monitoring.
Over- and under-invoicing
Misrepresenting the price of goods or services to transfer value between importer and exporter — invoicing below fair market price transfers value to the importer, invoicing above it transfers value to the exporter. One of the oldest methods of fraudulently transferring value across borders.
Phantom shipment
The extreme form of over-shipment, where an exporter ships no goods at all but colludes with an importer so that all shipping and customs documents are routinely processed — with banks sometimes unknowingly providing trade financing for the non-existent shipment.
Special Recommendation VII
Requires financial institutions including money remitters to include accurate and meaningful originator information — name, address and account number — on funds transfers and related messages, with that information remaining with the transfer through the payment chain, and to apply enhanced scrutiny to transfers lacking complete originator information.
The IX Special Recommendations
Nine recommendations on terrorist financing which, combined with the 40, form the international standards for combating ML and TF — covering ratification of UN instruments, criminalisation, freezing and confiscation of terrorist assets, reporting of suspicious transactions, international cooperation, alternative remittance, wire transfers, non-profit organisations and cash couriers.
The seven areas of the 40 Recommendations
AML/CFT policies and coordination; money laundering and confiscation; terrorist financing and financing of proliferation; preventive measures; transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons and arrangements; powers and responsibilities of competent authorities and other institutional measures; and international cooperation.
The three steps against TBML
Building better awareness through training of customs, law enforcement, FIUs, tax authorities and banking supervisors with private-sector outreach; strengthening current measures through access to case studies and red flag indicators and better domestic inter-agency information sharing; and improving international cooperation through clear gateways, MOUs, mutual legal assistance treaties and customs-to-customs agreements exchanging export and import data.
Three methods of moving criminal value
Through the financial system using cheques and wire transfers; by physical movement of banknotes through cash couriers and bulk cash smuggling; and by moving value through false documentation and declaration of traded goods and services.

Check you have understood it

The L1 test for this chapter has 6 questions. Score 60% to unlock L2 Application (worked numericals and scenarios) and then L3 Exam-Ready (NISM-style traps, timed, with this paper's real marking). Tests, the higher levels and full mock exams need a free account so we can track your progress.

Create a free account

Original explanatory writing based on the official NISM workbook for Series IFSCA-01, which is published and copyrighted by NISM. Check figures against the current edition at nism.ac.in.

Something look wrong? Report it