All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Change of control

Also written Change in control · Change of sponsor or manager

A change in who controls an AIF's sponsor or manager — majority board appointment or control of management for a company, or a 50% controlling interest otherwise — needing SEBI approval and an investor exit.

In plain language

An investor commits to an AIF largely because of who runs it. If the manager is sold to a different group, the investor may be locked into a fund run by people they never chose.

The SEBI (AIF) Regulations treat that as a material change. They define what counts as a change of control, require SEBI's prior approval, and — for closed-ended funds — give investors who disagree a way out at a fair value, paid for by the manager rather than by the investors.

How it works

The definition (Chapter 15, section 15.4.2).

Sponsor or manager is"Control" means
A listed or unlisted companyThe right to appoint a majority of the directors or to control management or policy decisions, exercisable by persons acting individually or in concert, directly or indirectly — including through shareholding, management rights, shareholders' agreements or voting agreements
Any other entityAny change in its legal formation or ownership, or a change in controlling interest — an interest of not less than 50% of voting rights or interest

Approval. Under Regulation 20(13), on a change of sponsor or manager, or a change in control of the AIF, sponsor or manager, the AIF must take prior approval from SEBI.

Other material changes. The workbook groups change of control with a change in sponsor or manager (not including internal restructuring within the group) and a change in fee structure or hurdle rate that may adversely affect investors.

The mandatory exit option — closed-ended funds.

  1. Unit holders who do not wish to continue get not less than one month to express dissent.
  2. The exit is by buying out the dissenting investors' units — by the manager or a person the manager arranges.
  3. Before the buy-out, units are valued by 2 independent valuers, and the exit is at not less than the average of the two valuations.
  4. Responsibility for the exit rests with the manager. Expenses are borne by the manager, sponsor or proposed new manager or sponsor — never charged to unit holders.
  5. The whole process is completed within 3 months from the last date of the offer for dissent.
  6. The trustee (for a trust) or the sponsor (for any other AIF) oversees the process and updates SEBI.

The waiver. The exit process does not apply where the AIF has obtained approval of not less than 75% of unit holders by value of their investment.

Investors should avoid simply defaulting on commitments in response — that is a contractual breach of the subscription agreement; the exit option exists so they do not have to.

A worked example

Narmada Credit Fund, a closed-ended Category II AIF with net assets of Rs 400 crore, learns that its manager is being acquired by another financial group, which will get the right to appoint a majority of the manager's board. (Figures illustrative.)

Is it a change of control? Yes — the manager is a company and the acquirer gains the right to appoint a majority of directors. The AIF must obtain SEBI's prior approval.

Route 1 — seek the waiver. The manager asks investors to approve the change. It needs holders of 75% by value: Rs 300 crore of the Rs 400 crore. It receives approval from holders of Rs 280 crore — not enough. The exit process must run.

Route 2 — the exit.

StepDate
Dissent offer opens1 July
Last date for dissent (at least one month)31 July
Exit to be completed by (3 months from last date)31 October

Priya dissents. She holds 5,000 units.

ValuerValue per unit
Independent valuer 1Rs 1,180
Independent valuer 2Rs 1,240
AverageRs 1,210

She must be bought out at not less than Rs 1,210 × 5,000 = Rs 60,50,000. The valuers' fees and every other cost of the exit are borne by the manager or the acquiring group — not deducted from what Priya receives.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 15 (Fund Monitoring, Reporting and Exit), sections 15.4.1 and 15.4.2 define material changes and change of control and set out the exit process; Chapter 13 (Legal Documents and Negotiations) lists change of control among the material changes to the PPM that trigger a compulsory exit option. Expect questions on the 50% controlling-interest test, the one-month dissent period, the two valuers and their average, the 3-month completion deadline, who bears the cost, and the 75% waiver.

Common exam traps

  • Two tests, depending on the entity. Board-majority or management control for a company; 50% controlling interest (or change in legal formation or ownership) for any other entity.
  • Internal restructuring within the group is not a material change of sponsor or manager.
  • SEBI's approval is prior approval.
  • Dissent period: not less than one month. Completion: within 3 months from the last date of the dissent offer.
  • Two independent valuers; exit at not less than their average — not the lower of the two.
  • Costs fall on the manager, sponsor or incoming manager or sponsor, never on unit holders.
  • 75% by value waives the exit. The tenure extension threshold is two-thirds — do not mix them.
  • The mandatory exit option applies to closed-ended funds.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series XIX-C

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it