All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Valuation agency

Also written Valuation agencies · Valuation matrix provider · Mutual fund valuation agency · Neutral valuation agency

An independent agency whose valuation matrix mutual funds must use to price non-traded and thinly traded debt; there have to be at least two, and AMFI has appointed CRISIL and ICRA.

In plain language

An equity share has a price. The exchange prints one every day.

A lot of debt paper does not. Many bonds barely trade, and some do not trade at all. Yet a scheme that holds them still has to publish a NAV every single day.

Somebody has to say what that paper is worth. SEBI does not leave the answer to the fund house.

It uses outside valuation agencies instead. They publish a valuation matrix. The AMC has to use that level to arrive at a fair value for its non-traded and thinly traded debt.

There must be at least two such agencies. AMFI has appointed CRISIL Ltd and ICRA Ltd for the purpose.

Using an outsider removes the temptation. A fund house that priced its own illiquid bonds could flatter its own NAV, and the investors who bought or sold that day would pay for it.

How it works

Chapter 3 section 3.4.7 lists valuation agencies among a mutual fund's service providers, next to the credit rating agencies and the KYC registration agencies. The rule is short:

  • SEBI has issued guidelines for arriving at the fair valuation of debt securities that are non-traded or thinly traded.
  • Under those guidelines there have to be at least two valuation agencies that provide a valuation matrix.
  • The AMCs have to use this valuation level to arrive at the fair valuation of those investments.
  • AMFI has appointed CRISIL Ltd and ICRA Ltd for the purpose.

The agency's number lands inside a wider regime. Chapter 7 section 7.1 requires AMCs to value investments in accordance with the investment valuation norms in the Seventh Schedule of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations 2026, and the first fair valuation principle says valuation shall be reflective of the realizable value of the securities or assets. Traded securities other than money market and debt securities are simply taken at the last quoted closing price on the exchange where they are principally traded. It is the paper with no such price that needs an agency.

One other asset class gets its own version. In Chapter 10, SEBI has mandated that mutual funds employ neutral valuation agencies to determine the current valuation of real estate investments — although the workbook adds that currently there are no mutual fund schemes investing in real estate.

The workbook does not go further than that. It does not say how a difference between two agencies' levels is resolved, what the agencies charge, or how they are selected. Do not supply an answer it does not give.

A worked example

Krishna Corporate Bond Fund has net assets of Rs 1,200 crore across 100 crore units, so its NAV is Rs 12.0000 — a debt scheme carries its NAV to 4 decimal places.

Inside that portfolio sits Rs 60 crore (at cost) of an unlisted NCD issued by a mid-size NBFC. The paper has not traded for six weeks. There is no market price to copy.

If the AMC simply held it at cost, net assets would stay at Rs 1,200 crore and the NAV would stay at Rs 12.0000. Instead the AMC applies the level from the valuation matrix, which (illustratively) values that paper 2 per cent lower, at Rs 58.80 crore.

Net assets (Rs crore)Units (crore)NAV (Rs)
NCD held at cost1,200.0010012.0000
NCD at the matrix level1,198.8010011.9880

An investor redeeming 50,000 units that day receives Rs 5,99,400 instead of Rs 6,00,000 — Rs 600 less. That Rs 600 stays in the scheme, with the investors who did not redeem.

That is the point of the exercise. Every rupee of over-valuation in an illiquid bond is a rupee the leavers take from the stayers, and an independent matrix is what stops the AMC deciding who wins.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 3 (Legal Structure of Mutual Funds in India), section 3.4.7, in the run of service providers a mutual fund depends on; Chapter 7 section 7.1 for the fair valuation principles the number feeds into; and Chapter 10 for the real estate rule. Expect straight recall — how many valuation agencies there must be (at least two), who appointed them (AMFI), and which two they are (CRISIL and ICRA) — plus a conceptual question on why non-traded debt is valued by an outside agency rather than by the AMC.

Common exam traps

  • At least two agencies, not one. The plural is in the rule.
  • AMFI appointed them. Not the AMC, not the trustees, and not SEBI directly — SEBI issued the guidelines, AMFI named CRISIL and ICRA.
  • They value non-traded and thinly traded debt. A traded share is taken at the last quoted closing price on the exchange where it is principally traded; it needs no agency.
  • Real estate has its own wording — neutral valuation agencies — and the workbook notes that no mutual fund scheme currently invests in real estate.
  • A valuation agency is not a credit rating agency. A rating agency grades the issuer's ability to pay. A valuation agency puts a price on the paper. Chapter 3 lists them as separate service providers.
  • Not the same as an empanelled valuation agency. That page is the portfolio management regime, where APMI empanels the panel and every portfolio manager must source debt and money market prices from it while keeping ultimate responsibility for fair valuation. This page is the mutual fund regime under the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, with AMFI's two appointees. Answer from the paper you are sitting.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it