All Courses are free for limited time.
NISM Professor

Fair valuation principles

Also written Principles of fair valuation

SEBI's ten principles requiring a mutual fund to value its holdings at realisable value, in good faith, under Board-approved and disclosed policies, so every investor entering or leaving gets a fair price.

In plain language

A mutual fund scheme is owned collectively by all its unitholders, and that ownership keeps changing as people buy and redeem. Every one of those transactions happens at the NAV. If the NAV is wrong, somebody is quietly paying somebody else.

Value a bond too high, and investors who redeem walk away with more than their share while those who stay are left holding the shortfall. Value it too low, and new investors buy in cheaply at the existing investors' expense.

The fair valuation principles exist to stop that. Their primary objective, in the workbook's words, is fair treatment to all investors — existing investors as well as those seeking to purchase or redeem — in all schemes at all points of time. They also address mispricing risk and reduce the vulnerability of short-term debt-oriented schemes to redemption pressure.

AMCs must value investments in accordance with the norms in the Seventh Schedule of the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations 2026.

How it works

The ten principles, condensed:

No.What it requires
1Valuation reflects the realisable value of the securities, done in good faith and in a true and fair manner
2Board-approved policies identify the method for each type of security; a new type of security may be bought only after its valuation method is approved by the AMC Board
3Assets are valued consistently, with a process for exceptional events when market quotes are unreliable
4Periodic review of the policies; the trustee and AMC boards kept updated; review by an independent auditor at least once a financial year
5Policies address conflict of interest
6Valuation policy is disclosed in the Statement of Additional Information, on the AMC/fund website, and wherever SEBI specifies
7Responsibility for true and fair valuation stays with the AMC even after disclosure; if the policy does not produce fair value, the AMC must deviate, reporting to both boards and disclosing to investors
8Policies to detect and prevent incorrect valuation
9Documentation of the rationale, including inter-scheme transfers, preserved for audit trail
10For debt and money market securities, consider trade prices of the same or similar security on all available public platforms

Where the Principles of Fair Valuation conflict with SEBI's Valuation Guidelines, the Principles prevail.

The guidelines themselves then give specifics: a traded equity is valued at the last closing price on the exchange where it is principally traded; a security not traded on any exchange for 30 days before the valuation date becomes a non-traded security, valued in good faith on Board-approved methods reviewed by the trustees; gold and silver held by ETFs use the LBMA AM fixing price.

A worked example

A debt scheme has net assets of Rs 500 crore across 5 crore units, so its NAV is Rs 100. One bond in the portfolio is still carried at Rs 40 crore, but after bad news about the issuer, trades in similar paper suggest it could only be sold for Rs 30 crore. Figures are illustrative.

Fair value: net assets = Rs 490 crore, NAV = Rs 98.

Now suppose the AMC does not mark it down, and investors holding 1 crore units redeem at the stale NAV of Rs 100.

Valued fairly (Rs 98)Not marked down (Rs 100)
Paid to redeeming investorsRs 98 croreRs 100 crore
True net assets leftRs 392 croreRs 390 crore
Units left4 crore4 crore
True NAV for those who stayedRs 98.00Rs 97.50

The early leavers took Rs 2 crore that belonged to the investors who stayed — 50 paise on every remaining unit. An investor who stayed with 20,000 units lost Rs 10,000 simply because the valuation was slow.

That transfer, repeated across a stressed debt market, is exactly the "redemption pressure" on short-term debt schemes that the principles were designed to reduce. Principle 7 settles who answers for it: the AMC, whatever its disclosed policy said.

Why NISM asks about it

Chapter 7 (Net Asset Value, Total Expense Ratio and Pricing of Units), section 7.1, lists all ten principles and the valuation guidelines that follow. The chapter's very first sample question asks where the valuation policy must be disclosed — the answer being the Statement of Additional Information. Expect further recall on the objective of the principles, the annual independent-auditor review, who bears responsibility for fair valuation, and which prevails when the principles and guidelines conflict.

Common exam traps

  • The valuation policy is disclosed in the SAI, not in account statements or the factsheet — and it is certainly public.
  • Responsibility stays with the AMC even when it has followed its disclosed policy. If the policy gives an unfair value, the AMC must deviate.
  • Independent auditor review at least once a financial year, not once in three years.
  • Principles prevail over the Valuation Guidelines in a conflict.
  • A new type of security needs an approved valuation method first, before the scheme invests in it.
  • Non-traded means no trade on any exchange for 30 days before the valuation date — not 30 trading days on one exchange.
  • The objective is fair treatment of all investors — existing, incoming and outgoing — not maximising the NAV.

Check yourself

  1. 1.As per SEBI's fair valuation principles, it is mandatory to disclose the valuation policy in the:

    1. a)Statement of Additional Information
    2. b)Statement of Accounts sent to investors periodically
    3. c)Fund factsheet
    4. d)Fair valuation principles are not to be made public
    Show the answer

    Answer: (a) Statement of Additional Information

    Principle No. 6 requires disclosure of the valuation policy and procedures — covering each category of security, the situations where each method applies, the process and methodology, and the impact of implementation — in the Statement of Additional Information, on the AMC's/mutual fund's website, and anywhere else SEBI specifies.

    The purpose is stated plainly: to ensure transparency of the valuation norms adopted by the AMC.

    The SAI is the right home for it because valuation norms are standardised across all schemes of the fund house, not specific to one scheme.

Where this is taught

Free preparation for NISM Series V-A

Related terms

← All terms
Something look wrong? Report it